I need to have a chat with Debbie about this as I respect her views immensely but I can’t ignore my own experience of the Lyma (zero results). Plus, it makes enormous claims, claiming the sort of results that it normally takes several rounds of in-clinic treatment to achieve, and has the flimsiest scientific backup. And, despite making these claims, the company hasn’t seen fit to put the product through a single clinical trial or comparison with other devices. So, I don’t rate it and nor do my laser-manufacturer-acquaintances to whom I have grumbled about it. How can it produce enough power to give a result from a rechargeable battery? How can anything that has the power to genuinely improve the skin be safe to use around the eye without protection? And so on.
Related Stories
Tweakments
Toxin in your 20s – five things you need to know
Alice and I get asked about wrinkle-relaxing injections in your 20s fairly frequently. So, here are five…
Tweakments
What is HIFU?
HIFU stands for high-intensity focused ultrasound, a treatment that can target various tissue depths in the…
Tweakments
Are you too old for tweakments?
3 reasons why it's never too late for tweakments, and you're not too old!
Tweakments
Price Awareness: Injectable moisturisers
How much does injectable moisturiser treatment cost, and what affects that price?