I need to have a chat with Debbie about this as I respect her views immensely but I can’t ignore my own experience of the Lyma (zero results). Plus, it makes enormous claims, claiming the sort of results that it normally takes several rounds of in-clinic treatment to achieve, and has the flimsiest scientific backup. And, despite making these claims, the company hasn’t seen fit to put the product through a single clinical trial or comparison with other devices. So, I don’t rate it and nor do my laser-manufacturer-acquaintances to whom I have grumbled about it. How can it produce enough power to give a result from a rechargeable battery? How can anything that has the power to genuinely improve the skin be safe to use around the eye without protection? And so on.
Related Stories
Tweakments
An Aesthetic Doctor’s First-Hand Experience Of Having A Hair Transplant
If you are worried about thinning hair or a receding hairline, you are far from alone. Losing your hair is a...
Body contouring
Would You Try This Inflatable Suit To Tone Your Body?
We’ve always been told that lying back and relaxing won’t do a thing to transform our bodies...
Concerns
The Tweakment Ladder: How To Take Your First Steps In Tweaks
Given the huge number of tweakments available, it’s increasingly hard to work out where you should...
Tweakments
Less Is More – How To ‘Press Pause’ On Ageing With Natural-Looking Filler
Can we really ‘press pause on ageing’ using dermal filler? Alice visited globally-renowned...